Ethical Theories Essay

A equity is a mark of a certain psyche that is valued as macrocosm good from a particular charge up of view and answers the question of what actions ar moral and what be non. Also, morality is the radical of universe honorablely correct and good. There had been several unalike estimable theories that exist in the fraternity and each having polar standards or theme for morality. One of the intimately known theories in the contemporary time in the field is legality honorable motive which is one of the 3 major prescriptive morals approaches. sexual abstention ethics originated in the ancient Greek generation that takes inspiration from the works of the Greek philosopher, Aristotle while other theories in equity ethics overly incorporate elements from the works of Hume, Plato, Aquinas and as well as Nietzsche. Basic bothy, virtue ethics gives importance on the character of a individual. Thus, it is the character of a person that is the key element and the basis of universe good or morally correct kinda than laws/rules or even off the consequences or outcome brought about by a particular action. harmonize to virtue ethics, we should look at the character of a person rather than his or her duties and actions. It is how one mass be kick downstairs person that is devoted tenseness rather than the castigate thing to do. It is easy to live a harmless flavour according to Aristotle and that the main reason for those who do so is to be happy. Thus, a virtuous life gives happiness which is the main or ultimate goal of every human being according to virtue ethics. In order to become a better person, virtue ethics suggest that one essential practice virtuous acts on a regular basis. These acts will eventually become wontual and thus, making the habit of doing such acts as a natural day to day bodily function which in the long run, will make the person a better being. Thus, the ultimate aim of the particular person is to make concourse h appy. Virtue ethics suggests that a person living a virtuous life will eventually do virtuous things not only to be happy but as well as to make people happy which in turn will be their main aim and goal in life of a virtues person. Virtue ethics too assumes that all humans have capacities that are inherited and that, as tell earlier, actions that could improve these capacities are considered as ethical and those that hinder the improvement of these capacities are not, that is, if an action is able to develop the potential of the particular person, it is the morally rightly thing to do and otherwise, morally wrong. These, inherited potentials, according to ethical theories are wisdom and intelligence and so, in order to live a virtues life, we must be able to develop our wisdom and intelligence. Thus, rather than trying to arrange goodness or innocuousness, improving ones character is assumption the importance and is the basis of ethically good actions and is virtue ethics o f import theme. By giving emphasis on the persons being rather than actions, virtue ethics aims to achieve something that is genuinely wanted by the person rather than focusing on the incoherent ideas about the after-life which are found to be arguable. It is tell that virtue ethics is applicable to all, flock easily be understood and fits into both dos and donts of philosophies and as well as devotion. Therefore, it is like a combination of both religion and philosophy. Every ethical surmise suggests standards of morality and according to virtue ethics, right actions are the precedes of being a moral person. It is by becoming a moral person that we will eventually know what actions are righteous from what are wrong and thus, we flourished as human beings. Virtue ethics also suggests that virtue is an important and admirable human characteristic just as courage and kindness. Virtue ethics also suggests that a good society is a result and accomplishments of virtuous people in th at particular community.Thus, it can be utter the virtue ethics is far more different than other ethical theories beat such as Consequentialism that focuses on the results of a certain actions or Deontology that focuses on certain rules and duties of every individual as set by the society. Consequentialism would ask what actions will bring the most earn and the least harm to the persons that are problematic and will be touched by the action.On the other hand, Deontology will ask what actions are pass by the society and that are accordance to the moral rules or laws as dictated by the society or culture. Still, as mentioned earlier, virtue ethics does not focus on the action itself or on the result of that action or even in the set of rules that are present in the society but rather, on the character of the person involved in making the decision. By evaluating the points of these ethical theories, it can be said that all have their own strength and as well as weak points when it comes to decision making and one cannot be considered as superordinate word to the other. Still, taking either side will also be babelike on the points of view of the person making the decision. One problem with virtue ethics is that it is mostly not applicable or of little financial aid to persons who are facing dilemma. The same thing also goes for Consequentialism and Deontology. If for example, you can besides a friend by lying to a certain person or group, would lying be the action by a virtuous man or is it considered as a simple lie that a virtuous man should avoid? In this case, it can be said that virtue ethics cannot be applied and does not help the person in making a decision. Another problem faced by virtue ethics is that it cannot justify a certain problem for doing so would require a basis of what is moral. In this case, the decision on which virtues are considered morally correct and which are not are has to be make which is definitely a hard thing to do. Thus jus tifying certain actions ground on what virtues are moral and what are not are hitherto a big question. On the other hand, it can also be said that the one of the distinct strength of virtue ethics is that it gives emphasis on the connection between our characters and our acts. It also views our character as whole and unified rather than treating each as isolated when it comes to making ethical decisions. Thus, a persons virtue is considered as a gist and not as fragment of different aspects and that one character/trait is not isolated from the other. Thus, virtue ethics looks at the individual, something that most ethical theories fail to do. There is no absolute theory that exists in which all will agree that it is definitely the right standard of living a virtuous life. Thus, every theory has its own critique and opponents. This is because of the difference in the experiences, knowledge and points of view of every individual, being unique in different ways. Thus, an ultimate t heory can never really exist.The actions that must be taken by every individual defends on both his or her experiences and values together with the situation at hand and no theory will be able to solely suggest what ought to be and not be done. Therefore, decision making is not just a take of theories and principles but of experiences, knowledge of the situation and of the people involved and the complete being of a person making the decision.ReferenceStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2000). Virtue Ethics. Retrieved April 28, 2008 from http//plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue/3