True Love

English 200 Poe shew Explication squargon be ack at presentledged by Wislawa Szymborska This piece is an es evidence is an analysis of Wislawa Szymborskas meter dead on tar besot manage. When I first read the numbers, I was struck by its sheer simplicity and leanion at what Szymborska feels that it means for 2 nation to be in imbibe a go at it. How invariably upon further contemplation, I see how she uses the scrape sexrs to symbolise change in an otherwise boring and regimented world w here only actions must be carry offn for the betterment and promotional material of the state. on-key grapple is a powerful piece that is told through the adept ab bulge superstara of an anonymous tyrannical bureaucrat who doubtfulnesss the value of sock when compargond to the needs of the state. True Love was scripted at a duration when Soviet control was strangling the easterly Bloc countries, giveicularly Poland. In this situation, citizens were expected to cave in the ir pop offs to the advancement of the several(prenominal)ise psycheal needs were secondary. In light of this situation, Szymborska forces the reader to examine the numbers on a number of levels including the socio/political level and withal at the base level of ii mickle brought to totalher as wiz.I go out discuss how Szymborska, very cleverly, uses the distinguishrs to illustrate how individuals puke make gist change from within a system when they ar passionate around their beliefs. I provide also discuss that manage, the most primal of mans needs, gutter be so complex in its simplicity that it pot evoke and frighten those who misunderstand it. The first stanza of the metrical composition consists of intravenous feeding guides True slam. Is it normal, is it adept, is it possible? What does the world get from cardinal citizenry Who make up is a world of their own? (lines 1-4)Szymborska causes by asking questions slightly sack kayoed however, is she actu in ally asking well-nigh respect or is she teasing whether it is practical for a hostelry to ac cheatledge agree it off? As an emotional human being, iodin would be fit to firmness these questions in the affirmative that, yes, cut is normal and serious and practical. When plurality argon in bop, they argon happy and probably more than productive because of their commitment to the other mortal. However, when one looks at these first four lines with the jaded eye of, say, an authoritative, repressive bureaucrat indeed, perhaps, love serves no resolve simply to get in the commission of serving the state.This person exponent answer these same questions by saying that, though love mightiness be normal and serious, it is non practical because how laughingstock one perpetrate his/her bearing to society if they ar more concerned about the person that they love? To this person, the world (state) would get no intimacy from deuce people who know is a world of their own so this should not be allowed to take on. In lines 5 13, Szymborska uses the persona of the bureaucrat to begin casting dispersions and snide comments about the audacity that two people would devour to dare settle down in love. Placed on the same pedestal for no correct reason, rawn randomly from millions, still convinced it had to happen this way in reward for what? For nought. (lines 5-8) In these lines, the reader begins to understand that he is now hearing the phonation of the face slight bureaucrat whose soul interest is the betterment of the state. Or, perhaps, we are hearing the speech of someone who has suffered through bad relationships in the past. I confide it to be the former. Szymborska wrote this poem in 1972 in a Poland that had been under the authoritarian shape of the Soviet Union since 1945. In the six familys to begin with the Soviets, Poland was command by the occupational forces of the Nazi Third Reich.I am convinced that the pers ona that we are hearing is the voice of an authoritarian government illustration a cold, complimentary Orwellian figure. This is the section of the poem where the jaded voice of the person rings through loud and clear when he states it had to happen this way in reward for what? For nothing. (line 7-8) Of course, the person in love would differ vehemently with this for their reward is garnered from each one time they look into the eyes or feel the touch of the one they love that is ramify of the reward, the reciprocal love shared between two lovers.They would answer yes, it did happen this way and here is my (our) reward. The persona continues his lament when he states The light descends from nowhere. wherefore on these two and not on others? Doesnt this outrage effectiveice? Yes it does. Doesnt it collapse our painstakingly erected precepts, and cast the moral from the peak? Yes on both accounts. (lines 10-13) In these lines, not only does the persona question the valu e of two people being in love besides he also questions the innovation of a spiriteder power (God) The light descends from nowhere.And why on these two and not others? (lines 10-11) The persona refuses to believe God or doctrine could escape a character reference in determining who falls in love or why love happens except, then wonders why these two people deliver been chosen to be with each other. Seemingly taken aback for a split second, the persona then falls back into his numbing, bureaucratic role when he asks the questions, and then answers his own questions, in the affirmative, about how love how love would disrupt the painstakingly erected principles and would the moral be cast from the peaks.The persona typifies the cold, uncaring demagogues who reveled in the Soviet occupation of Eastern European countries, neer questioning those in power and ensuring that all rules were delineateed. Look at the happy duet. Couldnt they at least try to hide it, fake a miniscu le depression for their friends sake Listen to them laughing its an insult. (lines 14-18) With these lines, the persona is now drawing attention to the lovers, trying to castigate them and make the other citizens, presumptively those who experience no love in their lives, hate the lovers as such(prenominal) as he does.The personas hate, though, does not stem from a legitimate dis ilk still from fear fear that if more people began to feel love then they would not be so see to the state and the power of the state would be diminished. The persona states that the lovers laughter is an insult, though to whom is the insult directed? It is an insult to the state because, through all of the dreariness that is their vitality, the lovers fetch found something that the state housenot control (their love for each other) and they nip that.Their laughing is not an insult quite the contrary, they are laughing because in their world they are one and that makes their world an idyllic pl ace. The third stanza ends with the line And their circumstantial celebrations, rituals, the elaborate mutual routines its obviously a plot of land behind the human races back (lines 19 21) To either regime, the ultimate fear is that they hurt control of the citizenry the cogs in an chilly machine. When the persona fannynot explain (or give birth) how love can occur, the only logical answer is that it must be a plot against the state (the human race. Why else would these disrespectful citizens waste their energy on each other sooner than towards the advancement of the state? Stanza four materialises the poems persona set about to panic as he wonders what would happen if, God forbid, more citizens begin to follow the lovers example and experience love for themselves Its life-threatening to purge guess how far things might go if people start to follow their example. What could religion and poetry count on? What would be remembered? What renounced? Whod indispensability to stay within bounds? (lines 22-26) Historically, oppressive regimes take a crap worked hard to rigorously limit what people can read, see, hear or say.This repression of free expression, it was (is) thought, helped to master(prenominal)tenance the people in line. The government begins to take on the role of a strict parent, ensuring that their naive child remains ignorant of what takes place orthogonal their home (b auberges. ) However, how can that same government oppress a moral hospital that is aware of basic human rights? Therein lays the rhetorical question how ya gonna defend em down on the farm? ( later on theyve seen paree. ) The persona is pondering this very question and fearing the worst possible outcome that a bureaucrat could imagine Whod insufficiency to stay within the bounds? (line 26) The fear of seeing two people in love, walking out of step from the rest of the automa gross ton-like population, has pushed the state (our persona) to a point of hysteria. Rather than accept that love happens, that people are unique as individuals, the persona continues to present reason to reject love True love. Is it really necessary? Tact and common sense dictate us to pass over it in silence, like a outrage in Lifes highest circles. It couldnt populate the planet in a million years, it comes along so rarely. (lines 27-32)Once again, the persona, having pondered the worst that can happen, deflects from acceptance of love and, instead, questions its relevance in a big-brother type society. . . . pass over it in silence, like a scandal. . . (line 28), or Perfectly good children are born without its help. (line 29) direct the good citizens that love is an aberration. If they should ever take on it (God forbid) they should conceal their nose and walk past because it is no better than a scandal that would pull at the very fibre of the society that is smell for afterward their needs.In fact, love is not ever required for the creation of acc urate(a)ly good children. They state is the ultimate provider who get out take care of all your needs from cradle to grave. Yes, to the poems persona, everything is for the advancement of the state dismantle if that means the dehumanization of the states citizens. The poem ends with three chilling lines Let the people who never determine professedly love keep saying thither is no such thing. Their reliance testament make it easier for them to live and die. (lines 33-35) According to the persona, ignorance is bliss.By continuing to bunt along to the states cadence, the faithful testament acquit blue lives and nice, quiet, easy deaths. However, it is never easy for a ideateing, rational human to simply go through the motions each day living a nonsense(prenominal) life, existing only for the betterment of a faceless, emotionless entity just another(prenominal)(prenominal) cog in the great machine. Will it get under ones skin been worth it? For those who never k new-fangl ed that love existed, or chose to ignore loves existence, then their lives would have been no distinguishable than those of a school of fish simply expiry along to get along.For those who have experienced love and passion then their lives would have been lived to the fullest and their deaths mourned and celebrated by those whose lives they had affected with love. The adjust love mentioned in this poem is represents two principles the first is the love that is found between two people and how, through that love, they can overcome obstacles in their lives. The power of faith and love can be powerful assets when two people are walking a path together through life. The second principle is that of social accountability that should be the responsibility of every compassionate and free considering person.The era in which Szymborska wrote this powerful poem is testament to the poems social meaning. Soviet oppression was the norm and the Big blood brother mentality among both bureaucrat s and citizens alike encouraged both conformation to the rules and divulging the identities of those who would not conform. Szymborskas poem forces the reader to identify which group he/she belonged(s) to and how their lives are affected by that decision. Works Cited Schlib, John and John Clifford, eds. Making literature Matter An Anthology for Readers and Writers. 4th ed. Boston Bedford/St. Martins, 2009. Print.True LoveAlex True Love This is something that divides us as humans, with quite a lot of gray battleground in the middle. You pass on view people that swear to the truth of this and others that try to finally prove it false. Right now I see myself in the grey area, questioning. Does square love exist? Is it possible for everyone? I am not sure even what this is seeing as I have yet to be in love. I have very much asked myself if there was a one true love for me and if someone somewhere was pulling the strings just right so that I would meet them or not. In recent year s the divorce rate in the States has gone up.Some say this is because women have become more independent and no longer feel the need to stay with a man in format to survive. I think that the Statesns have lost faith in an Ancient belief, true love. Or maybe the problem is that we are trenchant for something that doesnt exist. Can true love scientifically be turn up? Is there something in our body that tells us when we are in love? If we could find a way to prove that true love exists can we tell when two people are really in love? Do we really want to know? If someone that we love dies can we get married again?Love verseCan there be more than one person in your life that you have loved, love, or depart love? I want to look into why this is different for everyone. I expect to find what makes us believe in something when most of us can say we have never experienced it. How did this belief come about? Is it possible to fall in love no number the appearance, gender, or race? I kno w we all have our prejudices exclusively perhaps true love is the bridge over these barriers. Polygamists treat their wives like property but still say they love them. If you truly love someone how should you treat them?I think that scientific re search will read that love does exist and that you can fall in love multiple times in a life. Fate is something that cant really be proven. I also am hoping to find how the conceit of a true love came about. I dont think that an interview will help more because it varies so much from person to person. What I want to accomplish is to focus on three main points for my paper. First, can true love be scientifically proven? I also want to go into how it has proved the existence of love? (I believe they have)Second, why do we believe in true love in the first place?Third, has America lost plenty of the idea of true love or are we focusing on it too much? There is a lot more I could go into but these are my main three. To begin, I first need to establish what true love is. plot of ground I am trying to figure out if this proposed phenomenon actually exists, for this section I will assume that it does. This basis will allow for proof or disproof. Getting everyone to agree on one definition is impossible, so I hope to highlight a couple. First, I wanted to find an bind on the Christian view of how to find true love.Since most of the population in America is made up of Christians, I felt that it was important that this view was included. It begins with the famous verse from Corinthians, Love is patient, love is kind This is a view that many people hold dear to their hearts. This clause is more of a guide for Christians on how to find true love and tells that in order to find true love that we need to do three things. First, the article says to read the bible and find what to look for in love. following(a), honesty is needed with ourselves and the one we love. Finally, to be nimble to commit for a lifetime and understan d what this commitment means.The view of this article is that love lasts perpetually and that unless you are facial expression for the right qualities that you wont ever find it. While this is only one opinion, it is quite standard. The undermentioned definition needed comes from the opposite direction, science. This article from CNN states that look intoers from Stony Brook University have proved the existence of lasting love. Their research focused on new lovers and couples that have been together for around 20 years. They analyzed the chemical reactions when the person was shown a picture of their loved one.Old research had found that the chemical reaction in new lovers fade within 15 months and is gone after 10 years. Somehow, these scientists managed to find a few couples that defied these statistics. 0 percent of the couples that had been together for twice the add together of time that their love was supposed to fade by had reactions the same as a new couple. This defini tion of true love is based on time and fact but it is just as real as an immeasurable definition. This next source is called 7 Myths of merrily Ever After by Blair Justice. This is an article about how Americans view perfect relationships (incorrectly).Instead of looking at a definition, this looks at common misconceptions. The first is about how all people look for that person to live mirthfully ever after with. It states that we all are prying for that unconditional love, futilely. We shouldnt have that unconditional love between us and our colleague in order to have that perfect relationship. Then, that when there is true love between two people that they should not have to tell the other what they want. Third we search for someone with the same problems that we have and that will make both of our problems disappear.Maybe he/she will even understand and that will be plenteous. Fourth, dont go to bed angry. An unhealthy relationship would be if you never slept away from your partner after an aim. As long as you are not running away and can try and station the change of the argument behind you. Fifth, we never talk. We actually talk a lot but we need to learn how to communicate better. Sixth, he will change after we are married. We need to get rid of the illusion of changing our partner later. This entire article tells pretty much what Americans view as true love.The question that is brought up by all these wrong beliefs is, if we change how we think about love can we find it? What the focus needs to qualify to is recognizing this love. When you fall in love you head in full force. You devote all of your attention to that one person and nothing else. The passion and heat takes over. This is not true love, though. True love is the kind that lasts this heat we all feel in the beginning of a relationship will constantly fade. If there were a device to prolong this feeling, it would be coveted by all. How do we act when we are truly in love?In this art icle from Christian Answers gives a reheel on how to know when you are in love. The first step to having a true relationship is establishing that what you have is exclusive. By telling your partner that you want to be with them and only them shows that you are ready to commit fully. Next you say that this is the best relationship that you have had. It is like starting a new chapter in your life where you can only go forward. Then, once you are past the lets go anywhere stage and the stage where you stand up for yourself, this article says that you can accept the other persons interests to partake in them sometimes as well.The article says that you must accept the other persons beliefs enough to not oppose them. You also have to just be able to enjoy the other persons company enough that doing nothing together is like a break from the rest of the world, even though you are with him/her. Lastly, it lists that you have to show that you are comfortable being yourself in front of them. Overall I believe that this is a good list of how to recognize true love. There are many people loosing the locoweed of true love and this can be represented by the amount of divorces in the United States. When two people get married, most say that they will be married eer.Some hold on to the view of happily ever after, while others are more realistic about their life after marriage. unmatchable thing that we have to accept is the ending of marriage. While many people say that 50% of all marriages in America end in goodbye, this is not entirely correct, this article states. The facts do show that if the current trend continues that we may even surpass this number. We loose sight of the hope for true love for many reasons. The main reason in this short article is childlessness. The absence of children leads to loneliness and weariness This last article is called True Love?Forget it This article argues that true love does not exist. The author, Lynn Truss, says that we often use the non-existence of a perfect partner as an let off to not find love at all. If someone was just looking for the right person they might pass up on several people that might not be perfect, but are perfect for them. The definition of love is given as what you do with what youve got. We often have unrealistic views of love and this is because of two things. First, love is deeply placed in human nature and we see love as something we find. Actually, he states, love is something we create, an achievement.So this article is saying that we make up true love to take aim a void in our life that everyone has. Love is something we make not something we just bump into. To turn this last topic around I would like to highlight a girl that never gave up on love, even if it hurt. Nancy Rue says in her book, Coping with Dating Violence that roast happens in many ways. Sometimes the guy doesnt want to lose the girl and sometimes he has anger issues. What I was interested in was why women tend t o stay with these men when they arent treating them right. This book states that women often blame themselves for the abuse.What I am interested in is the fact that some stay because, in the beginning, it was perfect and they were so in love. Was this true love that just went wrong or a facade from the beginning? When girls fall in love with this boy they are really falling in love with him, she states. When a girl is being abused by the mental illness that the boy has. During this process I well-educated a lot, but not as much as I wanted to. Next year I will have to write a ton of papers. While this encounter was interesting, I dont see it preparing me for the future. I already know how to research, so hat was one of the easiest parts. The main thing that I learned from this project was MLA format. I have worked with many kinds of formats before so it was good to be able to focus on just this one. What I really liked about what I did was the quality of research although I wish t hat I had the time to get more. I also make summaries daily for other classes which made it easier to do the summaries in here. One thing that I really need to work on is my citations. close of the times they need a little bit of tweaking, in order to be fully correct, there arent too many problems.What I learned in both this area and in MLA format will most certain(a)ly help me in later projects. During this particular project I liked it simply because it was different. It is not like the typical high school paper. One thing it could have benefited from was a little less structure. We were able to pick out our own topic which was nice but turning in our summaries every due date was a little confining. I believe that more freedom would have also been more responsibility, so I understand the structure somewhat. I began this paper with an idea. Actually, I had many ideas but my main one was my best-loved.This idea has become a growing question in my own life. Does true love exist? Some people believe they can answer this question with a yes or no. This is not the answer that I want. I want a reason, explanation, but most of all information. Im not researching that feeling you get when you see that cute guy a couple rows over in class smiling at you. I am looking at actual, forever love. I was hungry for information and began searching from many different angles. I found scientific evidence and put it right along side the religious. I read stories about unutterable abuse and tales of enchanting love.The scientific evidence claimed its existence, if rare. Just by looking at divorce rates in America shows how wrong we can be about love. These are some of my favorite sources. My absolute favorite has to go to the book I read. This story speaks to me in a way that none of the articles could. One of the stories from this book tells of a girl that fought so hard for love, she almost died. The desperation that she feels is what makes this the best in my eyes. After all of this time I think I can finally say that I have an answer that makes sense to me.True love is out there for everyone somewhere. It is just up to you to find it and hold on tight. There will never be a world where everyone will find this connection but the first step is knowing what to look for. At the very least, you should know what to stay away from. This conclusion has helped me with my own life, even if it never helps another person. I wish that I could not change my question but instead write a follow up piece. If I could it would be on the history of love, how it has evolved. That topic intrigues me but the one I wrote this paper on was just right for me.True LoveEvery moment we worn-out(a) togetherHas touched our lives, our souls foreverThe things that we shared and learnedIs stable increment that weve earned. The person that I have bounteous into todayDid not get there by chance, no wayI am who I am partially because of youAnd you are YOU because of me, tooThe cha nges I seeand what I have learned about meare a response to how we affected our livesand what we bump in each others eyes. It is uncertain if we have to part or one day live together both way, we have touched our lives forever No numerate what the future will showNo consequence what we are told.We are connected on such a deep levelsThat no one can repeal that, not even the devil. Our feelings might be different a year from nowBut you are part of me forever somehowA part of me will always be you and a part of you will always be me. no matter what happens ,that much is certain our souls are one until life closes the curtain. I will love your foreverFor worsened or for betterYou are tattooed in my heart And nothing can tear our souls apart. Source Forever Connected, True Love Poem http//www. familyfriendpoems. com/poem/forever-connectedixzz2RErIYwFpwww. FamilyFriendPoems. om Every moment we spent togetherHas touched our lives, our souls foreverThe things that we shared and learned Is permanent growth that weve earned. The person that I have grown into todayDid not get there by chance, no wayI am who I am partly because of youAnd you are YOU because of me, tooThe changes I seeand what I have learned about meare a response to how we affected our livesand what we discover in each others eyes. It is uncertain if we have to part or one day live together Either way, we have touched our lives forever No matter what the future will showNo matter what we are told.We are connected on such a deep levelsThat no one can remove that, not even the devil. Our feelings might be different a year from nowBut you are part of me forever somehowA part of me will always be you and a part of you will always be me. no matter what happens ,that much is certain our souls are one until life closes the curtain. I will love your foreverFor worse or for betterYou are tattooed in my heart And nothing can tear our souls apart. Source Forever Connected, True Love Poem http//www. familyfriendp oems. com/poem/forever-connectedixzz2RErIYwFpwww. FamilyFriendPoems. om Every moment we spent togetherHas touched our lives, our souls foreverThe things that we shared and learnedIs permanent growth that weve earned. The person that I have grown into todayDid not get there by chance, no wayI am who I am partly because of youAnd you are YOU because of me, tooThe changes I seeand what I have learned about meare a response to how we affected our livesand what we discover in each others eyes. It is uncertain if we have to part or one day live together Either way, we have touched our lives forever No matter what the future will showNo matter what we are told.We are connected on such a deep levelsThat no one can remove that, not even the devil. Our feelings might be different a year from nowBut you are part of me forever somehowA part of me will always be you and a part of you will always be me. no matter what happens ,that much is certain our souls are one until life closes the curtain. I will love your foreverFor worse or for betterYou are tattooed in my heart And nothing can tear our souls apart. Source Forever Connected, True Love Poem http//www. familyfriendpoems. com/poem/forever-connectedixzz2RErIYwFpwww. FamilyFriendPoems. com True loveMy first true love was Zachery Kyle Sutterfield I remember the day we met When I first met you, I felt like I had known you forever Both shy, but wanted to talk. Every moment we have spent together Has touched our lives and souls forever The things that we share and learn Is permanent growth that we earn. The person that I have grown into today Did not get there by chance, no way I am who I am partly because of you You are YOU because of me, too. The changes I see What I have learned about me A response to how we have affected out lives What we discover in each other eyes. We are connected on a such a deep level